Help us: Donate
Follow us on:

Vitamin D Supplements Linked to Slower Epigenetic Aging

Two out of five clocks showed a significant association.

Old woman in sunlightOld woman in sunlight

Using a Berlin cohort, a study published in GeroScience has uncovered a link between Vitamin D supplementation and a reduction of epigenetic age.

On the back of previous work

This study’s cohort consisted of 60- to 85-year-old participants in the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). The researchers had previously used data from this cohort to determine a relationship between a lack of vitamin D and an accelerated epigenetic age. Their hypothesis was confirmed by the use of 7-CpG, a novel epigenetic clock that is strongly associated with chronological age [1]. That study showed that people who are deficient in Vitamin D have an epigenetic age that is nearly a year more than average [2].

This new study set out to answer a different question: Does restoring Vitamin D through supplementation also reverse the effects on epigenetic age?

A long-term longitudinal study

To answer this question, this study’s authors utilized over a thousand participants who were approximately 68 years old at baseline and re-examined at an average age of 75. This group was roughly evenly split between men and women.

At baseline, nearly half of the participants were deficient in Vitamin D, and only 7% were taking supplements; in the follow-up portion, only a quarter were deficient, and a fifth were taking supplements. Both times, about three-fifths of the participants received their blood draws during the sunnier months of the year, when Vitamin D deficiency is less likely.

The researchers note only 55 people whose increases in Vitamin D can neither be explained by supplements nor by season. They also note that, while some people who were originally taking Vitamin D supplements had stopped, a full 82% of the supplement takers in this study had only begun after their baseline examination.

A quasi-interventional study

In order to analyze the effects of Vitamin D supplements, the researchers noted 63 people who had previously been deficient in Vitamin D but who became sufficient after supplementation. They then matched these participants (based on demographic data) to 63 people who were deficient and unsupplemented, marking them as the untreated group. Finally, after matching, another 63 unsupplemented but healthy people were utilized as controls.

The results were clear only for two of the five clocks: Participants who went from deficiency to sufficiency through vitamin D supplements were shown to be epigenetically younger by more than two and a half years according to the 7-CpG clock and a year and a quarter younger according to the Horvath epigenetic clock, which is also associated with chonological age. However, while some effects were visible on the Hannum, GrimAge, and Levine clocks, these differences were not statistically significant.

As expected, there were also no significant differences between the Vitamin D supplemented group and the people with naturally healthy levels of Vitamin D.


Despite the researchers’ efforts, this is still a longitudinal study and not a true, blinded effectiveness study. There was no placebo group, and the treatment, untreated, and healthy groups were established after the fact. The researchers also note multiple potential confounding factors, most notably that people taking Vitamin D supplements might have attempted to improve their health through other means as well.

With that in mind, it is likely that an ongoing lack of vitamin D is having an effect on epigenetics, but to prove the existence of such a causal relationship, a double-blinded study must be conducted. Fortunately for such future research, a double-blinded study has already been conducted on the safety of Vitamin D supplements.

We would like to ask you a small favor. We are a non-profit foundation, and unlike some other organizations, we have no shareholders and no products to sell you. We are committed to responsible journalism, free from commercial or political influence, that allows you to make informed decisions about your future health.

All our news and educational content is free for everyone to read, but it does mean that we rely on the help of people like you. Every contribution, no matter if it’s big or small, supports independent journalism and sustains our future. You can support us by making a donation or in other ways at no cost to you.

Lifespan News – Young Blood for Brain Boosting

This episode of Lifespan News, presented by Emmett Short, discusses a study showing that the brains of old mice benefit...

Daily Step Count, Less Mortality, Diminishing Returns

A new study using wearable accelerometers suggests that you don’t have to clock extreme numbers of steps every day to...

Using AI to Measure Age Through the Eyes

An accepted manuscript in eLife Sciences has described eyeAge, a new clock that uses deep learning to analyze the eye in...

Inhibiting DREAM for Enhanced DNA Damage Repair

In a new study published in Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, researchers have demonstrated that by manipulating the DREAM protein...


[1] Vetter, V. M., Meyer, A., Karbasiyan, M., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Hopfenmüller, W., & Demuth, I. (2019). Epigenetic clock and relative telomere length represent largely different aspects of aging in the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 74(1), 27-32.

[2] Vetter, V. M., Spira, D., Banszerus, V. L., & Demuth, I. (2020). Epigenetic clock and leukocyte telomere length are associated with vitamin D status but not with functional assessments and frailty in the Berlin aging study II. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 75(11), 2056-2063.

About the author
Josh Conway

Josh Conway

Josh is a professional editor and is responsible for editing our articles before they become available to the public as well as moderating our Discord server. He is also a programmer, long-time supporter of anti-aging medicine, and avid player of the strange game called “real life.” Living in the center of the northern prairie, Josh enjoys long bike rides before the blizzards hit.
  1. janbartch
    June 15, 2022

    Hi Josh,
    I’m officially elderly at 73. So. thus is just my observation.
    It seems the relatives that got dementia earliest, never worked 9-5, stay at home mons, didn’t drive, etc.
    Was wondering if early behavior and life style also contributes to aging faster.

  2. angelajdavies68
    June 16, 2022

    Hi josh
    If one doesn’t work, will listening to radio, talk back, podcasts audiobooks TV news TV documentaries, read books, internet articles, online courses with exercise, Mediterranean style diet, good sleep contribute to not getting dementia and avoid to poor quality early life.

  3. Rob Tucker
    July 1, 2022

    Interesting study, even if crafted post hoc from a tranche of data.

    I also found the article interesting for its suggestions related to differences between deficient/ supplemented versus not-deficient. Other studies of vitamin D have identified this dichotomy but there is still a lack of clarity.

    Aside from the potential implications for vitamin D levels, I wonder if the entire polyphenol family will turn out to modulate epigenetic clocks in various ways. I am especially interested to see new research on fisetin and quercetin.

    Thanks for the article.

Write a comment:


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.