Help us: Donate
Follow us on:
×

Menu

Back

Neuromodulation Improves Memory in Older Adults

This effect has a lasting effect of at least one month.

BrainwavesBrainwaves

A new study published in Nature Neuroscience has shown that neuromodulation of low-frequency neuronal activity in the parietal cortex improved working memory, while high-frequency modulation in the prefrontal cortex improved long-term memory in older adults [1].

As people age, their cognitive abilities get worse. This includes memory decline, which might dramatically impact quality of life. Although age-associated memory decline varies from person to person, in some people, it might lead to being unable to perform well at work or deal with daily tasks. As accelerated memory decline might also be indicative of dementia, it is critical to develop technologies for memory enhancement in the elderly.

Manipulating brain electricity

Neurons are electrically active cells. The electrical currents generated by multiple neurons can be measured by electrodes placed on the scalp using a non-invasive technique called electroencephalography (EEG). EEGs have long been used to assess mental states and diagnose various conditions such as epilepsy.

EEGs can detect distinct brain activity patterns that correspond to various mental states. These rhythmic neural activities are recorded with EEGs at different oscillation bands (frequencies): delta (≤ 3 Hz, seen in deep sleep), theta (3.5 – 7.5 Hz, seen in drowsy adults), alpha (7.5 – 13 Hz, seen in awake adults), beta (13 – 31 Hz, most frequently seen range in adults and children), and gamma (≥ 30 Hz, detected in a state of active information processing).

High-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) is the inverse of EEG: instead of recording, the brain activity is stimulated at a specific frequency using electrodes placed on the scalp.

Previous research has shown that working memory and long-term memory are stored differently, with distinct anatomical regions of the brain involved. It was also suggested that by modulating brain activity in specific locations at specific frequencies, it would be possible to selectively improve either working or long-term memory.

In this study, the researchers explored if HD-tACS modulation of low-frequency (theta rhythm) in the inferior parietal lobule and high frequency (gamma rhythm) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex could enhance working and long-term memory functions, respectively, in adults over 65 years of age.

Location and frequency matter

The study consisted of three experiments. The first two were randomized, double-blind studies consisting of three groups. The third experiment was conducted to test the reproducibility of the findings from the first two.

In the first experiment, the participants were assigned to the gamma prefrontal cortex neuromodulation group (group 1), the theta parietal lobule neuromodulation group (group 2), or a control group with no stimulation. In the second experiment, the experimental groups were switched, and the researchers performed gamma parietal lobule neuromodulation and theta prefrontal cortex neuromodulation.

The participants underwent neurostimulation using a BrainCap for 20 minutes every day over a four-day period. They were then asked to recall as many words as they could remember within two minutes from the 100 words that had been read to them previously. The task was repeated on each day of the experiment and a month later.

The results showed improved working and long-term memory only in the first experiment, suggesting that it’s crucial to stimulate specific regions of the brain at specific frequencies to enhance specific memory types.

In the third experiment, the neuromodulation was done for three consecutive days in an independent cohort of participants, and only experimental groups were included. Unlike the first two experiments, there was no long-term follow-up, but the overall results replicated the primary findings.

Individual responses

Not all the participants responded the same to the neuromodulation. During the first experiment, 85% of group 1 and 90% of group 2 showed memory improvement over the four days of neurostimulation. Moreover, how well a person’s memory improved in response to the neurostimulation predicted that person’s future memory enhancement one month after treatment. Therefore, personalization of the neuromodulation protocol is required to achieve the best results in each individual.

Abstract

The development of technologies to protect or enhance memory in older people is an enduring goal of translational medicine. Here we describe repetitive (4-day) transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) protocols for the selective, sustainable enhancement of auditory–verbal working memory and long-term memory in 65–88-year-old people. Modulation of synchronous low-frequency, but not high-frequency, activity in parietal cortex preferentially improved working memory on day 3 and day 4 and 1 month after intervention, whereas modulation of synchronous high-frequency, but not low-frequency, activity in prefrontal cortex preferentially improved long-term memory on days 2–4 and 1 month after intervention. The rate of memory improvements over 4 days predicted the size of memory benefits 1 month later. Individuals with lower baseline cognitive function experienced larger, more enduring memory improvements. Our findings demonstrate that the plasticity of the aging brain can be selectively and sustainably exploited using repetitive and highly focalized neuromodulation grounded in spatiospectral parameters of memory-specific cortical circuitry.

Conclusion

This study presents very promising results of non-invasive neurostimulation to improve both working and long-term memory in older adults. While showing the importance of using specific frequencies to improve different memory functions in different brain regions, it also demonstrates individual differences in response to neurostimulation. It is unclear if the positive effects achieved in this study would last longer than one month. Hopefully, future studies will clarify how long-lasting the effect of such neurostimulation is and how to develop personalized protocols for people to get the most out of this treatment.

We would like to ask you a small favor. We are a non-profit foundation, and unlike some other organizations, we have no shareholders and no products to sell you. We are committed to responsible journalism, free from commercial or political influence, that allows you to make informed decisions about your future health.

All our news and educational content is free for everyone to read, but it does mean that we rely on the help of people like you. Every contribution, no matter if it’s big or small, supports independent journalism and sustains our future. You can support us by making a donation or in other ways at no cost to you.

Dietary Magnesium in Dementia Prevention

Researchers publishing in the European Journal of Nutrition looked into magnesium as a possible candidate for preventing dementia, focusing on...

Glycine and Cysteine Combo Rescues Cognitive Decline in Mice

Scientists publishing in Antioxidants have reported that increasing glutathione levels with GlyNAC, a supplement that combines glycine and cysteine, significantly...

Vitalik Buterin Exclusive Interview: Longevity, AI and More

Vitalik Buterin holding Zuzu, the puppy rescued by people of Zuzalu. Photo: Michelle Lai Don’t try finding Zuzalu on a...

Centenarians Have Slightly Different Gut Ecologies

Researchers publishing in Nature Microbiology have determined that the viruses populating the intestines of centenarians are slightly different from those...

Literature

[1] Grover, S., Wen, W., Viswanathan, V. et al. Long-lasting, dissociable improvements in working memory and long-term memory in older adults with repetitive neuromodulation. Nat Neurosci 25, 1237–1246 (2022).

CategoryNews

Related Topics

About the author
Larisa Sheloukhova

Larisa Sheloukhova

Larisa is a recent graduate from Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology located in one of the blue zones. She is a neurobiologist by training, a health and longevity advocate, and a person with a rare disease. She believes that by studying hereditary diseases it’s possible to understand aging better and vice versa. In addition to writing for LEAF, she continues doing research in glial biology and runs an evidence-based blog about her disease. Larisa enjoys pole fitness, belly dancing, and Okinawan pristine beaches.
  1. askdrt
    September 18, 2022

    Larisa,
    Keep me updated on articles like this regarding neurostimulation. Thanks

Write a comment:

*

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.