Longevity Through Altering Essential Gene Expression

This approach works in yeast, but could it work in humans?


DNA DetailsDNA Details

In a new study published in GeroScience, researchers have shown that it is possible to significantly increase yeast lifespan by overexpressing genes highly conserved across various species [1].

To do this, we need your support. Your charitable contribution tranforms into rejuvenation research, news, shows, and more. Will you help?

Survival and aging

The question of the effects of nature versus nurture, or programmed versus stochastic, sparks hot scientific debate in other fields as well as aging. A similarly controversial question involves how much research into other species can actually be translated to humans.

This study addresses both issues. The researchers sought to explore if essential, highly conserved genes, which are common to both yeast and people, can be manipulated to extend lifespan.

The authors use the term “essential genes” to describe the genes required for the survival of an organism. These genes are usually conserved across species and undergo little sequence change in evolution. They are also heavily expressed and form hubs of protein-protein interaction networks.

Paradoxically, essential genes tend to be understudied precisely because they are essential. The two most widely used techniques to explore gene function, knockout (deletion) and knockdown (reduced expression), lead to organismal inviability when applied to such important genes, so studies involving these methods are rare.

The importance of essential genes for organismal survival might go hand in hand with their ability to control the rate of aging. However, previous experiments on the nematode worm C.elegans showed that out of almost 3,000 essential genes screened, partial knockdown of only 2% of them in adulthood resulted in increased lifespan [2].

The researchers then argue that instead of reducing the expression of essential genes, their upregulation is more likely to increase lifespan. They chose S. cerevisiae yeast as a convenient model organism to check this hypothesis. Importantly, most yeast essential genes are identical to their human homologs, while about half of them can be replaced by their human counterparts without compromising their function.

Dialing up, not down

First, the researchers generated 993 yeast strains, each with an increased expression of one essential gene by a specific bacterial plasmid. They then randomly selected 92 strains and assessed their replicative lifespan, as measured by the number of daughter cells a mother cell produces before becoming senescent [3]. 20 to 80 individual mother cells in each strain were analyzed in both experimental and corresponding wild-type control groups.

Only 5 of these strains showed any growth difference from the control group. In the preliminary replicative lifespan analysis, the researchers identified 29 (~32%) strains with at least 20% longer lifespan and 6 (7%) strains with at least 20% shorter lifespan than controls.

The overexpressed essential genes of the long-lived strains are known to perform various functions, such as DNA repair, vesicle trafficking, mRNA surveillance, post-translational modification, and oxidative stress resistance. This highlights the complexity of aging along with the expected success of multi-targeted approaches to extend healthy lifespan.

Further analysis of the long-lived strains confirmed 19 strains with significantly increased median replicative lifespan. Moreover, the researchers verified that the observed longevity was the result of the upregulated essential gene expression in three out of these 19 strains, as they removed the plasmid and observing a shortening of lifespan back to the wild-type level.

A close look at individual genesΒ  Β 

To assess if the longevity effect was achieved via the same mechanisms, the researchers performed comparative transcriptome analysis of four long-lived strains, each overexpressing one of these essential genes involved in RNA metabolism: LSM5, TIF35, UTP6, and PRP22.

On average, the overexpression of each of the four essential genes was doubled, which was enough to increase replicative lifespan. Importantly, there was a significant overlap of the genes affected by the overexpression of UTP6, TIF35, and PRP22, suggesting a common mechanism at play. Among the common affected downregulated genes were those potentially involved in the activity of transposable elements, suggesting an important role of this process in aging.

In addition, the researchers identified several exceptionally long-lived strains, with the overexpression of GDI1 and TIF35 leading to more than 50% median replicative lifespan increase. The former gene is involved in autophagy and protein quality control, while the latter participates in protein synthesis initiation.


At the cellular level, many aspects of aging are conserved across species. This has been demonstrated by numerous studies in simple model organisms like Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabdits elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster. Because most genetic screens examine loss of function mutations or decreased expression of genes through reverse genetics, essential genes have often been overlooked as potential modulators of the aging process. By taking the approach of increasing the expression level of a subset of conserved essential genes, we found that 21% of these genes resulted in increased replicative lifespan in S. cerevisiae. This is greater than the ~ 3.5% of genes found to affect lifespan upon deletion, suggesting that activation of essential genes may have a relatively disproportionate effect on increasing lifespan. The results of our experiments demonstrate that essential gene overexpression is a rich, relatively unexplored means of increasing eukaryotic lifespan.


In this pioneering study, the researchers identified a surprisingly high number of pro-longevity factors among essential genes in yeast by increasing their expression rather than decreasing it. The question, as always, is whether or not this technique would work in other species, particularly humans. Given that the genes are highly conserved, it just might.

Of course, there are still a lot of other questions to answer first. In this study, only 10% of essential genes that are potentially important for longevity were analyzed. Thus, there is a lot of room for exploring, even in yeast.

We would like to ask you a small favor. We are a non-profit foundation, and unlike some other organizations, we have no shareholders and no products to sell you. We are committed to responsible journalism, free from commercial or political influence, that allows you to make informed decisions about your future health.

All our news and educational content is free for everyone to read, but it does mean that we rely on the help of people like you. Every contribution, no matter if it’s big or small, supports independent journalism and sustains our future. You can support us by making a donation or in other ways at no cost to you.

Restoring Heart Regeneration With a Metabolic Switch

In a recent article in Nature, researchers have restored cardiac regeneration to adult mice by disabling fatty acid oxidation, discovering...

Human Clinical Trials of NMN for Safety and Effectiveness

In a recent paper, researchers reviewed the literature for human clinical trials that address NMN's safety and anti-aging effects [1]....

Lifespan News – Elon Musk and the Living Forever Curse

On this episode of Lifespan News, Ryan O'Shea ruminates on Elon Musk's statement on living forever being a curse rather...

ARDD 2023: The Mother of All Longevity Conferences

Once a year, Copenhagen becomes a Mecca for the longevity community. Hundreds of people flock to the picturesque Danish capital...


[1] Oz, N. et al. Evidence that conserved essential genes are enriched for pro-longevity factors. Geroscience (2022) doi:10.1007/s11357-022-00604-5.

[2] Curran, S. P. & Ruvkun, G. Lifespan regulation by evolutionarily conserved genes essential for viability. PLoS Genet. 3, e56 (2007).

[3] Sutphin, G. L., Delaney, J. R. & Kaeberlein, M. Replicative life span analysis in budding yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 1205, 341–357 (2014).

About the author
Larisa Sheloukhova

Larisa Sheloukhova

Larisa is a recent graduate from Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology located in one of the blue zones. She is a neurobiologist by training, a health and longevity advocate, and a person with a rare disease. She believes that by studying hereditary diseases it’s possible to understand aging better and vice versa. In addition to writing for LEAF, she continues doing research in glial biology and runs an evidence-based blog about her disease. Larisa enjoys pole fitness, belly dancing, and Okinawan pristine beaches.
No Comments
Write a comment:


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.